Self Analysis -Part one

Its quite long time that I am living along leaving my own family.At the age of 25 it can be said you have almost spent half of your life .This is the point where you see towards your life and start to think the life that I lived is really meaningful,or I have done any mistake that should not be repeated.Recently I've been thinking about my own mortality. I've wondered, if I had to review my life right now, would I be proud of the choices I made? The one thing I know for sure, is that you can start new this moment. It's never too late. Instead of waiting for that final life review, take the time to go over your life's choices. What are you proud of? What are you not proud of? What would you change, if you could?Can you be a better person? Can you make up for any harm you created in the past? The answer is YES. We've all made mistakes. Especially if we were unaware souls or lost touch with our spiritual side. It is easy to get lost in this materialistic world. But deep down, we know between right and wrong. We know that it isn't always easy to do the right thing.thinking something different about life is just the analysis which intiates you to reform your life style.Take a moment to analyze your life. It may be very emotional to do so, but feel any pain you may have caused someone else. Put yourself in their shoes. Simple wrong decisions can even affect people you are unaware of. For example, say you decided to sell drugs when you were going through a rough streak as a teenager. Think about how you changed others lives by that choice. How it affected your parents, siblings who looked up to you, and mostly the people you sold to. Feeding their addiction, helping them poison their bodies. Now this may seem harsh, but it is reality. We have all made bad decisions, some worse than others. But someone has always been affected by those decisions.

SCUBA DIVING in NEW ZEALAND.........................

it was really great experience that I did in Newziland,Scuba Diving.I know many of you are not aware of this tearm.So I would like to make you remember the scene of Bollywood movie "Jindagi na milegi Dubara" where All the three guys the diving underwater in sea.The same thing i did here.it is not worthy to say it was really an awesum experience that i got here,and can be said it is the most memorable moment of my life.we went to Whitienga(Koromondal) to start the adventure.we were of a group of eight people 3 girls and 5 boys with two instructors a lady and a male.we reached the diving spot by the boat around 11 oclock and started our dive.it was really and amazing thing when at first I took my mask started to breathe the air by my mouth under the water.i was very much surprised how the technology has been grown up.As without the respiratory system we are able to dive.
With the help of professional divers and top-of-the-line equipments, you can explore the magnificent scenes of the underwater world. From coral reefs, fishes and colorful varieties of sea creatures, you can truly enjoy the experience of diving adventure. Many people find enjoyment in seeing what others do not usually see. Being able to witness the different flora and fauna an average person can only see through the books can be an adventurous recreational activity to enjoy with your family and friends.
Scuba diving is an excellent way to spend quality time and at the same time discovering the wonders of nature. There are many ways on how you could enjoy your adventure. You may want to participate in a dive trip in which you may go to places that have never been seen before. The fulfillment of having to experience the excitement of going to these places is what makes scuba a wonderful adventure experience one should try in his or her lifetime.
diving is really a great experience.I loved the sense of freedom I felt underwater, I liked the silence, the rythm given by my breathing. I liked everything: the forms of the corals, the colors, the small tropical fishes, and the beautiful sharks.I liked exploring new destinations, discovering new underwater environments.No matter what other people say, and no matter what kind of professionals may surround you while diving, it takes good courage for someone to do something he is really afraid of. That means that first of all you have to find courage in yourself to make the step. In order to have the desire to dive, you should first of all understand the joy of scuba diving. If you realize that you really want to dive to enjoy yourself fully and not just join your friends in their dive, you’ll more easily find courage in yourself. As you know, a strong internal wish can overcome any phobia.
Under the water you can feel a sense of weightlessness and complete freedom of movement. Even some people with disabilities, usually chained to the chair, have a new sense of freedom when gravity loses its power over them. An outside observer might think that diving seriously Curb Rights is a far cry from a sense of weightlessness. However, it is not. When the diver enters the water, all this weight really disappears.
In a sense, brings together your diving with wild nature. But not many courses in the world gives you this opportunity. Observers for the birds will never be able to fly along with the migrating flocks, but the diver can swim freely with a wide variety of fish shoals.
I dived to two times first time i was under the water I was for 20 mins and for the second time I was under the water for 40 mins.it was really an amazing experience to see the underwater world.when I came outside I was littlebit emotional.got the value of Breathing LIFE IS VERY PRECIOUS.As a human being being you have got very good life dont waste it in bakwas type work.Try to feel the beauti and creativity of Nature and go ahead...........................

Dont bother About future.....

Kadam kadam pe pehra baitha
jab main khola dukaan

matak nachania ainth k boli
mat ban tu bhagwan

mitti se hue ho paida
mitti me mil jaoge

koshish na karo udne ki
girne per na bach paoge

Sunkar maine dikhhayi battisi
lumba jibh nikala

aage ki baat aage dekhenge
aisa main chhilaya

char din chhoti hai jindagi
abhi kya utna rona

milta hai maja lene do
karne do sapne sajona

Raasta

dhalti gayi jindagi

Karwa banta gaya

chalte rahe kadam

marhawa kahta raha

nikle the tum akele

koi na tere saath tha

per tum pather dil the

jeet ka tumko ehsaas tha

kya kya kurbaniya di

kitne apne begane hue

raste jo kal tak apne the

aaj kaise anjane hue

tarakki ki chahat me

Ai dost itni door na nikal jana

chuut jaye kahi apne

lagne lage sara jahan begana

Sun k ye baat jab dekha maine mud k

tej ho gayi dhadkane

Dimag laga bolne udd udd k

bade ho gaye tum kamaye khub paise

per kya yahi jindagi hai chaha tha tumne jaise.............

Independence day Celebration

well, right after two days we are going to celebrate 15th august .not very important for all over the world but still its essential and breathtaking movement for every indian who is proud to be the part of the land.if a person reaches 60 years of age, he is labeled as an "Old Crippled". One can construe the picture of a man who is bed-ridden, invalid and too old to respond to any kind of treatment. He just lay aside, cherishing its blooming youthful days or he employs his time by playing with his grandchildren, but now the things have changed.I would like to expalain you a story about a country which is 60 years old and still very young, vivacious, highly engertic and is working enthusiastically towards its betterment.most of the world know it as the country which is containg more than versatility in the terms of religions in the terms of faiths in the terms of languages in the terms of skin as well as in the terms of breath.dont be amazed this is the country which has been always known for accepting all those who came from outside and wanted to take its shelter. It is "OUR COUNTRY INDIA". We never know how time sweeps. India was free from the clutches of Britshers in 1947. We still remember those stalwarts who sacrificed their lives to free us from Britisher's cage enabling us to fly freely, independently in the air. Now, for a change I will not again repeat the history of how India got is Independence. We all know and have studied umpteen numbers of times about it in our History books. We studied what all "Our Father of the Nation"- "Mahatma Gandhi" did, we all our aware of the Jallianwala Bagh tragedy and etc.We all normally says that Britshers ruled our country - they exploited us . But what they have given us is UNITY.Most of the people find shame to accept this fact,but it is the fact before the british rule our country was divided into so many parts.these are the british who united our country, we remained united till there time only, What happened after that ? - In Most of the families the two brothers are at daggers drawn with each other. Every one under the sun has become self-centered. After all who has the time to think about the welfare, prosperity of our nation ? Who is dutiful ? - No this is not what I am saying but what I heard in RANG DE BASANTI. Besides, this they have provided Tea - Coffee Gardens, and had given us the language ENGLISH which has now become a foreign inlingua. Aren't we people including me also is ashamed of speaking Hindi in public places or else people who don't know English are being labeled as an ILLITERATE people.As per residing in software industry I still can feel how people are counted as backward if they try to talk in hindi.It is the matter of assame when some bosy is trying to talk about its religion about its religious books etc.people now a days are not aware of the glorious history of the nation ,they also dont know the importance and glory of Hindi.but somehow it should also be accepted Somehow the english is now a necessity and we are responsible to make it high.the boundary is just not consumed towards 28 states but now the thinking level is spreaded globally. what is wrong in that, I completely agree to this that Yes, English is our mother tongue. Why? Don't you want to grab a job in multinational Company? How will we clear the interview? How will we become great personalities? We all should avail this opportunity in our 60 years of Independence to express our heartfelt gratitude towards them for giving this foreign language.We all curse Britshers, but become eagerly excited, over-enthusiastic when we get an opportunity to go abroad, like to the Big Apple. After who wants to stay in a Country endowed with unemployment, extreme poverty , filthiness, corruption , dowry deaths and all other social evils, but remember the case of Kiranjit Walia - who beared the virulent atrocities of her husband for 10 years , no not in a diminutive village but in a country like London.who is culprit for this .this type of case is happening in country like England which is most eagerly known for its prosperity and higher technological bases. Eventually was free and London people persistently protested against the government to release her, Even Goerge Bush wife awared her as She emanated valourness, courageousness. Her dauntless act to rescue herself was truly remarkable. She won Kudos, praises etc. But what if the same thing would have happenend in India? Remember that case of a girl who was just about to get married, her in-laws demanded dowry on the verge, As She was unbearable to see the sight of how her father was accousting, Her doughty act of calling cops just after few hours when she was about to tie the nuptial knot had labeled her as the most astonishingly talented women.In my family too people usually says This is my right to take the dowry why because I have also given the dowry for my daughter or my sister.you tell me just one thing If every body will start to think like this will this process can ever be deleted from the system?if your doughter or your sister is burnt for the money will you also burn ur wife for the sake of this viracious money? Yes India has done progess but still a the disease of discrimination between male and female still exits. After 60 years, India has got its women president Ms.Pratibha Devi Patik. Now we all assess her rule, her power what changes she will going to make instead of saying what has to be done , we all seriously hope that she will says what we have done ?What makes a country good and great? - It is the people, their power of knowledge, caliber, and perseverance. Their highly intellectual minds, Decisiveness, their open and above board dealings with others. A country is empty if there are no people. We the people form our Government, We the people rule not our lives but the whole life of our stupendous country. We the people makes or mars the present, future of our country. We the people mould , shape our country in whatever manner we want to. Like, a one person cannot contribute significantly towards the prosperity, success of the country in the same manner it is not in the hands of one person to change it. It is the collective responsibility of all and sundry to make a gloriously bright, radiant future and to be linked together in its weal and woe. We all know that it sounds the same and hackneyed but as a matter of fact this is the only transparent and solid truth. It is we the people only who back-bite and says bitchy things about our country, thus this is the major reason why our country is lacking far behind and is deprived of numerous facilities as compared to others. We all should become at home in this fact.As our Country has attained its 60 years of Independence and the prime ministers starting from Jawaharlal Nehru to Dr.Mannohan Singh speechifyies about the developments that they will do in the fields of agriculture, industry, infrastructure, education etc and the various measures implemented towards the economic growth of our country. To start, first I am dying to see that lucky day when, I don't which prime minister will say and point out the developments made in these sectors. That their longevity of speech should not reflect about the planned tasks but about the accomplished tasks - that will be the biggest achievement of our country. Quite bummed, that so far no one has said so.

Gandhism ::The Power

Sometimes I like to make an argument on fresh issues related with MahatmaGandhi and his practices.But it is shame to us that people usually find bravery to make a joke of this Mhatma.In all over the world, his methods were easily misinterpreted by Westerners. In order to fathom what he was about, westerners fluctuated between hyper-difference, in which Gandhi was seen as the inexplicable product of a foreign culture; and over-likeness, in which they found similarities that were not really there. The real Gandhi lay somewhere in between. The concept of non violence and making the country fre is somehow related to some basic experiments what this Mahatma did during the first cycle of our great revolution.it is being explained by some of our modern philosophers that gandhi was somehow a little bit controversial about his experiments can be eventually compared with the hindu religion.Gandhi departed from Hindu orthodoxy in two significant ways: on nonviolence and on caste. Ahimsa, or nonviolence, maintained that all killing should be avoided to accrue spiritual merit. Gandhi, who had encounters with poisonous snakes in South Africa and rabid dogs in India, redefined the concept and mandated killing for humanitarian purposes, as in the euthanasia of rabid dogs. If some Hindus were alienated by his lack of orthodoxy on ahimsa, many more fell out with him over his championing of the untouchables, the lowest of India's castes.in most of the part of our contry we common people still having this disease what we call as a regional old manuscripted thought where the people from lower caste should not be touched. In traditional Hindu belief, an untouchable's contact with the person, food, or drink of a member of a higher caste would defile that person. For orthodox Hindus, it was a scripturally enjoined inequality, a product of individual karma (action) and performance of dharma (dedication to a calling), and a proof of the cycle of sansar (reincarnation). Gandhi never succeeded in justifying his stance against untouchability; in the end, he simply asserted that Hinduism needed to change.Attempting to understand Gandhi fares no better if he is misconstrued as a product of Indian asceticism. Although Gandhi followed various ascetic regimens such as brahmacharya (celibacy), his purpose was to gain the strength for successful worldly action, rather than to accumulate spiritual merit. Just as mistakenly, Gandhian protest can take on the guise of things.it is not a matter a joke when there was a time people started to follow a person just by hearing his speech.in the stories and fairy tales we have heard the youngesters started to follow the witch or fairy because of her hyptonacy.But this was not the case at the time of slavery,where people from our country started to listen a particular person.It was the magic and poer of a mahatma whose theory and style somehow reflects the hope to get the freedom from slavery.Westerners already know well. Attempting to see in Gandhian nonviolence a form of Christian nonresistance glosses over the activist, confrontational element in Gandhism. Gandhi wanted worldly success, the independence of India, not divine martyrdom. He made salt, he burned cloth, he led boycotts, he was thrown in prison, but he never waited around to be thrown to the lions. The concepts of Gandhian nonviolence and pacifism are not at all close. Gandhi did not believe in turning the other cheek in every situation―evil had to be resisted, best done nonviolently, but better by violence than not at all. Passive resistance was the term that Gandhi originally used for his South African protest, but he soon disowned the term in favor of his neo-locution, satyagraha or soul-force. For Gandhi, passive resistance was a weapon of the weak, used expediently, not morally, when violence was impossible or too costly. When Gandhi pondered the case of the British suffragettes and Irish Republican hunger-strikers offering passive resistance in jail, he saw an essential coercive element in the protests, which made them akin to violent resistance. Such passive resistors were perpetrating nonviolence to extract concessions from their enemies. The purpose of India's nonviolent resisters, in Gandhi's terms, was to suffer nonviolently to engender trust and respect in their opponents. Civil disobedience against the state, and the anarchist spirit of protest it represented, was also a departure from the Gandhian concept. Civil disobedience as proposed by Thoreau and practiced by anarchists depended on individual acts. Mass action was suspect because participants might not share the same conviction or some might feel coerced into action.
In Gandhian protest, civil disobedience could begin with individual acts, but only for the purpose of mobilizing mass protest. Otherwise, civil disobedience was an ego trip, not a moral action. Gandhi's truth was not just a product of his Indian tradition; nor was he parroting methods already known in the West. It was a syncretism of Western and Indian practices that drew upon Gandhi's experiences living in England, South Africa, and India. By 1918 Gandhi had put together the three most important elements of his philosophy―namely, morally informed nonviolence, mass civil disobedience, and courageous suffering.
The concept was almost as strange to Indians as it was later to Americans. In the West, Gandhi was perceived as powerful for his ability to hold back threatened violence from the Indian masses. That power was taken as spiritual. Gandhi "suffers himself to be adored," as one New York Times commentator put it. Another commented that Gandhi's penitential fasting for political ends illustrated the "difference between East and West." A Gandhi sanctified in this manner spoke to American social activists only as a saint―which meant that he was heard best by Christian militants, rather than by secular ones, and that his work was taken as prophecy, not politics. Even this depended on seeing Christ like qualities in Gandhi and in tailoring nonviolent resistance to Christian nonresistance and pacifism. This over-likeness grew stronger from the 1920s on as Gandhi's influence over Indian nationalism developed and as more and more American clergymen went to India to meet the Mahatma and bring his ideas home. John Haynes Holmes, a Protestant minister, pacifist, and activist with A. J. Muste's Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR) was a major agent of Western over-likeness. He began to preach a Christianized version of Gandhi and Gandhism as early as 1918 and met the Mahatma in 1931. In a 1922 sermon, Holmes said that "Gandhi is thus undertaking to do exactly what Jesus did when He proclaimed the kingdom of God on earth." For many U.S. activists in the 1930s, even Christian ones, a Christ-like Gandhi gave no political direction. A. J. Muste remembered the period with regret: "In the thirties . . . we faced a terrible situation . . . .I did not know how to apply nonviolent methods effectively to the situation. The effort to apply Gandhian methods to American conditions had scarcely begun. Pacifism was mostly a middle-class and individualistic phenomenon." Rejecting Christ and a Christ-like Gandhi, Muste turned to Trotsky and Communism for a period.

Hanging Kasab............

Hanging the Kasab the topic is very Argumentative and need much more mature knowledge and dimension.Justice is not just hanging a person.It serves to set an example so that in future no onewould try to do the crime again.By delivering a death sentence to Kasab we cannot root out terrorism.How will a person who does not fear death he will be forced to be moved to realise that what he has done was wrong?So many people are daily killed day by day and the count is still going on.The very fact that you say he has killed many so deserves death brings out the very “emotional” argument . If you were to rationally think about this you would not say this.Indians were killed,We were attacked.Obviously a lot of incidents was flowing.the count and the happenings are going on.In times of crisis more than the enemy we need to fight with our own bodies.we as a human being we are reponsible for producing terror and terrorist in our society.we never think about the root cause and always try to find the shortCut solutionStill the second argument occurs Death of Kasab will make him a martyr in the eyes of other jehadis and the jehadis and Kasab himself will believe that he will reach Jannat. So the punishment won’t serve any purpose.this is the general thought what terrorist think before going to do attacks.Then about the money.Many thoughts were crossing my mind while reading people’s views on Kasab.In your rebuttal to this point ,you have kind of accepted the validity of the argument and your argument in effect proves mine.the incidents which are happening now days are we ever bother about these why it happened and who is the main culprit as a wholeWhat is terror?Why are we so enraged with just Kasab?What about the terror within?Militant groups? Religious fundamentalists, political parties….all are tacitly trying to break the fabric of this nation.We should be vocal about them too!Humlog yaha kuchh jyada conservative ho jate hain bahut sare cases aise bhi hain jaha killing hoti hai but we just neglect them. A Hindu terrorist killed a Christian missionary 12 years ago and is running Scot free!No body cares! He is a terrorist too.He too threats the country!why does no one speak about him? A group of people break down a heritage mosque in the nation!it takes 19 years for the verdict to come,no one cares!25 years on victims of riots get no justice!no one talks about them,this is definitely a rare case.But the incidents i mentioned were terrorizing too.About this case.Yes he deserves a harsh punishment.I never had any difference of opinion on that.But death is not that punishment.The burden of life is much heavier to carry for these men who were on a mission of death.just tell me if we are going to hang Kasab will this incidents will be removed ,it might be possible more of our people will be killed in blasts and etc.there should be some permanent solution about this.Moreover corollaries with Kandahar incident seem futile.that incident was an example of ineptitude and inefficiency on part of the erstwhile government in power.Speculating on that is a futile exercise.Moreover we have no right to take lives.Kasab killed cause he was blinded by faith.We want him hanged cause we are blinded by vengeance,in the end if we demand his hanging why we sink to the same lowliness that he is in now.Now we come on main root does our religion anytime says he is bullshit person because he is from a specific religion,we should not live at a particular city or town because that is filled with the people of a specific religion.we worship our holy book without reading or knowing about this .because there is no habit in our family to know the truth and the root reason.we are following whatever our old species followed.If believing in a god or gods is good, then why is so much pain and suffering caused by religion--like the crusades, suicide bombings,etc?If believing in a god or gods is good, then why is so much pain and suffering caused by religion--like the crusades, suicide bombings, etc., etc?This is a question we hear very often, and there are a number of ways of approaching the issue. meri baatein bahut hi odd aur behisab lag rahi hongi but just think about this.I'd like to try a scientific approach.The position is that religion causes war. Just like, say, alcohol causes inebriation and sunlight makes things grow.If we wanted to test the alcohol/inebriation or sun/growth hypotheses scientifically, what would we do? Quite simple: Remove the alcohol from whatever drinks we are serving and see if our clients are still inebriated. Same with the sun/growth theory: Remove the sunlight and see if things still grow.With the religion/war hypothesis, we don't have to actually make a clinical study--it's already been done for us. In the 20th century, we saw the most disastrous wars of history, both in Europe and in the Far East. Tell me, which of these were centered around religious disputes?I can't speak on behalf of other religions, but I can tell you that many of the great prophets of Judaism spoke of the value of peace even in a time when war was the accepted state of affairs. Isaiah's words are inscribed on the wall of the United Nations: "And they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation shall not lift up sword upon nation, neither shall they learn war any more."This is not the first case when it is happening the world has seen a very cruel incidents in the form of holocaust and still the count is going on in the form of terrorist attacks in all over the world.i know jo bhi log mare hain mumbai blast me unko dilasa dena bahut muskil hai lekin kasab ko just latkane se kuchh nahi hoga usko ya fir is theory ko hi hatana hoga which is producing a lot of kasabs in the society......

fight on the name of religion

Most people who believe in a certain religion, won't actually say that their religion is better than yours, however, there's not a doubt in my mind that at one point in their life, they actually thought it.I have so many people in my friend list who does argument always that their religion is better than any of the religion why this is like this?Just the actual thought of somebody thinking that their religion is better than yours, probably separates them from their own religious beliefs. I can't think of one religion that doesn't imply that their religion is the only way to salvation or to the promised land.No religion gives u permission to do violence but it is almost rived regularly on the name of religion.Once this thought becomes dominant in your mind, and you actually believe that your religion truly is better than all others and it is the only way to salvation or to the promised land, you're probably in too deep. I can't tell you how many times I've heard this simple statement or been able to read it on someone else's face like a glaring red beacon flashing over an airportst of the people in my family too deoes not know the history of their religion to.oo ,in spite of thisype about u t they worship sculptures and argue faltu type about religions.If you don't believe that some people think that their religion is better than others, I would like to challenge you to put it to a test. Simply ask someone if they are thinking about switching over to a different religion.

You're rarely going to hear someone tell you that they are, you're probably going to see a puzzled look on their face, providing you with the answer, without even opening up their mouths. There's a good chance that these people will tell you," No, they have never even thought about joining another religion." The problem is, they've probably never even spent the time to think about whether their religion is right or wrong.

I can't tell you how many people, that I meet on a regular basis, believe that their religious views are right and all others are now wrong. I can however tell you, that most of these people haven't took the time to study the origins of their beliefs thoroughly.

How can you judge another religion, when you don't really understand your own? If you have studied early hinduaism, like I have, there's a good chance that you won't ever again go around telling someone or even thinking it silently to your self, that your religion is actually better than someone else's.

Atheism part two

Atheism is not a belief that there is no God—it is the absence of belief in God. I am an atheist not because I am 100% sure that there is no God—how does one prove the negative anyway?—but because I see as little evidence around me for God as for flying fairies or invisible spiritual power. I’m open to evidence that any of those exist, but in the absence of such evidence, I will not believe in them.

God didn't create people, but you, religious people, created God in an effort to explain your fears, the unknown, the fear of death and a promised life after death, you fear death, you people need someone to take care of you, someone to protect you when you feel weak, the sum of what we don't know.. God is a creature of human thinking: you people created God because you needed something to believe in..

Look at it.. you people created Judaism, Christianity and finally Islam.. These religions preach the same lie, but they are full of contradictions.. you could not even agree on one religion or sect! Human nature at its best!

Religion is an idea.. worshiping something, a "super power", is a human need. Look at your history, you started worshiping small statuettes, then you evolved into worshiping one "super power": the sun (Akhenaten), then the idea of one almighty God came.. then version one of monotheism, Judaism, appeared, then a new upgraded version took control, finally appeared with Islam.. and who knows what is going appear next. Evolutions applies to human nature also, it applies to religion.

Aligarh Muslim University exam Part two

As I have stated,we were traveling in the train with somehow in difficult but exiting situation.The incident happened with the girl was also memorable.but the connection was only for two hours.Somehow the train reached at its destination at 10 o clock in the night.There was a huge crowd gathered at the station claiming to provide best accommodation for one night stay for upcoming exam.as we had heard only about the city but not experienced before ,we were hesitating to take a room.My nephew was hungry and it was his first time to come to Delhi (outside without his parents)it was my responsibility to arrange the things in proper manner.well, let me say, its not easy to move. when it happens, its sad. you loose a lot of friends. you have to change you habits. you have to talk to new people. and that's hard. because you have to try to trust the new ones. yes, you can stay in contact with your contacts, but it Nieveslast's long. you lose contact after a while. then when you reach the new town you have to learn all the areas, or you will get lost.The most dangerous situation was that it was the situation of communal riot there.we were not aware of the heat and effects of riot in the daily life(lack of experience).the real issue in explaining riots, I argue, is not which local political or sociological factors increase the likelihood of violence, but whether the level of government responsible for law and order (the 28 states, in India’s federal system) chooses to prevent violence or intervene quickly to stop it when it does break out. Rioters are not heroes and the state police and paramilitary forces – even in states like Bihar where the general quality of administration is far from high – have shown themselves capable of preventing communal riots when given the right direction by their ministers.Now here is the discussion arises about Communal riots we should try to talk Communal riots are a dangerous and a frightful phenomena and a curse for our society. Not only does a communal riot ends up in loss of lives and property, it divides and polarizes the society and gives rise to vicious political debates.Now in 21st century People are so much civilized and scholar then why we are gatting and facing the problem like this,when prople are killed by people just on the basis of ruthles theological matters.A lot of literature has been written and studies conducted on the issue of communal riots in India. But author of these studies are often labelled as ideologically colored rendering their work unacceptable by 'other' ideological camp. Hence, it'll be an informative and revealing exercise to see, direct from newspaper reports, that what causes these communal riots?Two things should be followed.First, the cause of a communal riot should be seen and understood direct from the newitems in the newspaper. Understanding and reconstructing the chain of event from political commentators and inquery commissions will reduce the truth element. The newspaper report can also be politically motived and biased but the likelihood of ideology contaminating the truth in a credible way is much less in case of newsitems as compared to reports of inquiry commisions and political commentators. One can always refer to multiple newspaper and reasonably filter out the truth.Second, the news of communal riot should be studied and analyzed at the time of its occurance itself. Analyzing such an event after lapse of time makes it more difficult to sift facts from ideologically-motived fiction. Since we, unfortunately, have so many communal riots, the sample size is not a problem in such a study and we have enough number of instances of communal riots where such a study can be done.Let us take the latest riot happened in one of the popular state ,I am not blaiming to any body ,but it can not be lied the role of state government in that situation.the state complicity by delineating a wider shift in Indian politics. The state government’s delay in calling in the army established beyond doubt that the anti-minority pogrom was being carried out with the involvement of not only the politicians but the state machinery as well. As in most riots in the country before and after Independence, minorities suffered disproportionately in Gujarat. He argues that ethnic riots are far from being spontaneous eruptions for a clear electoral purpose. Subsequently, it then follows these very political agenda. Instrumental political explanations for violence have been labeled ‘unsatisfactory’ not only by Wilkinson but also by other theorists. The second major problem identified by Wilkinson, with many political explanations for ethnic violence is that they fail to account for the variation in patterns of violence within states. In order to clear any confusion arising out of the critics made against the existing theories, Wilkinson posits three possible explanations for the differences in state performance. First, decades of corruption, criminalization, politicization and a general lack of state capacity have left Indian state governments too weak to prevent riots. Second, Indian state governments are unable or unwilling to protect minorities because they systematically under-represent them within their governments, police forces and local administration. Lastly and most importantly, the degree of party competition affects the value governments place on attracting ‘Muslim swing voters’, which effects whether or not the government will order the respective administrations to protect the minorities. He focuses on state and town level electoral incentives which remain important even if we assume various other factors, socio-economic and otherwise to be constant and controlled. Wilkinson argues that to win an election it is not necessary to appeal to each and every voter but to the voters who fear the consequences of not taking a defensive stand against the members of the other community.Three kinds of situations may develop which prove that as electoral competition increases, the level of riots goes down. First, the existence of three or more parties provides a security blanket to the minorities as the importance of swing votes increases provided the majority party is not trying to attract the fringe Hindu votes. A bi-polar state party system creates a potentially dangerous situation for the minorities, especially when the majoritarian party, which owns the anti-minority issues, tries to foment violence. The third situation can be exemplified by Gujarat and the events that unfolded in that state in the year 2002. The number of elections that are preceded by communal killings has taken an upswing over the years, especially since the Hindu nationalist BJP gained political prominence.The Way to Communal Harmony is a compilation of Gandhi's reflections on certain problems which divide mankind. Though they deal immediately with India, their validity extends beyond the circumstances of our country. Everywhere in the world, individuals and groups are divided because of fear, suspicion and hatred. It depends on local conditions whether the division expresses itself along religious, economic, political, caste or colour lines. Whatever be the form, insecurity is perhaps the major cause of individual and social dissensions. A person who. is integrated and sure of himself fears none and consequently provokes no fear. We have occasional examples of such heroic individuals, but we have not till now had instances, of societies or communities that are fully integrated and therefore fearless.Now we came on the scenario.we are standing on the station and waiting somebody who was providing a room..

Kashmir Issue Part1

In 1947, when the British granted India its independence, Mohammed Ali Jinnah wanted a separate country for Muslim majority ares of India. So the erstwhile British Empire of India was split into West Paksitan, India and East Pakistan. There were around five hundred princely states in India that were given the choice of joining the Paksitani union or the Indian union. Kashmir was ruled by a Hindu King of the dogra dynasty, and was given a choice to join either state.While he was dithering between joining India or becoming an independent country, the Pakistani army attacked Kashmir from the west, thinking it would be a quick battle. But the King of Kashmir asked India for help. India agreed to help on the condition that Kashmir would be part of the Indian Republic. The king hastily signed a document agreeing to join the union of India. The Pakistanis felt that he had no right to do that since the majority of his subjects were Muslim and would have sided with Pakistan and appealed to the international community to restore Kashmir to Pakistan, or let the people have their say. However, in the eyes of the world, Pakistan had forfeited any moral high ground because of their treacherous attack on an unguarded kingdom. So though they tried hard to get the United Nations involved later, they never mustered any international backing to thier cause. IT left them feeling bitter and frustrated and they felt the whole world was against them and had unfairly sided with India.
After the 1947 war, India controlled the best parts of the Kashmir valley (Jammu and Kashmir) and Pakistan occupied the rest, which is mostly uninhabitable. The recent devastating earthquakes in 2006 were almost entirely on the Pakistani side of Kashmir.Pakistan's founding politicians were so bitter that they swore a 'thousand year struggle' to get Kashmir 'back' from the Indians. Though, in the intervening sixty years, most Pakistanis have lost any hope of getting it 'back', and also have lost all fervor to get Kashmir to join Pakistan, no politician can openly say it is time they gave up and moved on.It is analogous to the US-Cuba situation. But in case of Paksitan the cost of this unending quarrel with India is enormous. They are forced to invest horrendous amounts of money in a fight with an enemy who is many times larger in terms of population, many times larger in terms of land and has grown into an economic powerhouse many times larger than Paksitan. In their desperation to harm India the Pakistani military tried twice to invade India (1965 and 1999) and was beaten back.This obsession with Kashmir and India has had serious and crippling consequenses to Pakistan's democracy. Military coups became a common place in Pakistan and democratically elected rulers were murdered, or usurped and put in prison by the military generals. The military became the dominanat institution in the country and destroyed democratic institutions and encouraged religious fanaticism. In 1971, to add insult to injury East Pakistan broke away from West Pakistan to become Bangladesh.In the ensuing years, Paksitanis have invested Billions in a nuclear bomb, untold amounts in a vast Military machine and also spawned various 'Jihad' outfits which have come back to haunt Pakistan in the form of uncontrolled domestic terrorism.The western countries try to get the Kashmir issue solved in the hope that Pakistan will then focus on the terrorists that have made Pakistan their home. But the hatred of Hindus runs deep in the Pakistani establishment and there is no end in sight to this issue.
(TAKEN FROM A POPULAR WEBSITE) in next part I will write my opinion about this.

Religion

Today the world is facing a great problem widely used as a term of Extreme religion.This is the term which is defined and measured when a human being does some nontolerable activities on the name of... religious faith. Extreme religion is where a religious concept and belief is taken and intensified using drastic and unreasonable measures, to enforce a particular belief whilst keeping the basis for faith.I am not blaiming any particular religion or community to produce extremities in front of the society on the basis of its theory and concept.The situations and running time is the main culprit which is being utilised by some group of people for their personal benefit. Creating a strict and sever religion which goes far beyond what is reasonable, moderate and normal. Extreme religion is very dangerous because followers do not comprehend societies normality as they believe and have tremendous faith in what is believed to be a wonderful religion, as they genuinely believe they are doing the work of God and creating a better world to live in.As a result what is happening The world is seeing too many accidents (in reality murders) being executed by these people. Not understanding the extremities to what is happening, unaware of the dangers inflicted upon others using such irrational behaviour and belief.Think back to your childhood. When you were a kid did you ever try to convince somebody you were really telling the truth? Did you ever say, "I swear to God?" how abut th...is one, "I swear on a stack of a particular holy book either Gita Kuran or Bible," you said it, sure you did. how about this one, "Cross my heart, hope to die, stick a needle in my eye," I said that a few times.we as a human being we hear the voice and directions from our parents that we have to follow this particular thory or we have to obey that particular guru or master but at the same time te second thing arises dont be in touch of that person he is from different caste or he is from different religion.Does A religious theory ever say hate a particular people from a particular caste or from a particular religion. promising things and wanting people to believe we were really telling the truth sometimes demanded that we swear because they were not used to us telling the truth. And all of that kind of swearing and giving oaths is really a device of man based upon his basic dishonesty. We invent those oaths and even in some cases curses imposed upon ourselves before God if we lie because basically we have learned that man can't be trusted to keep his word. Sometimes it's as simple as those silly childlike oaths, or sometimes it's as complx as things like swearing to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God, which we're required to say in a court of law. Religions today no longer serve the purpose for which they came into existence. The very basic theme of each relgion was to teach, how to love each other and bring us closer to ourselves and to God. Today the opposite is happening, Religions are not uniting but dividing us.The world is seeing so many incidents ,who is culprit of this you me or entire society,the system or the theology the philosophy or the personal thinking??? Forget the differences from religion to religion, each now has so many divisions. The biggst problem Religions are bringing in is Fundamentalism and in-tolerance, giving birth to Fanatics, who are ready to destroy our freedom,As i have said it is giving the birth to extreme religion whose effect is well known in all over the world, just in the name of religion.Love is not something which can be given by force, but Religions as they stand today are given by force, by parents to children. Anything given by force can never have fruitful results. Love is realized from within, with loving actions, loving emotions and loving feelings, and the results are always fruitful. On the other hand, Religions given by force, can turn us into what we are not, and take us miles away from God and Humanity.It is about time, to rectify our vision, rectify our way of life, and mould them to what the various religions originally desired. Humanity is the religion which all religions preach, so why not follow it as such.i am not blaiming the people who believe in particular religion but i would like to say dont believe blindly try to study the theory and cancept through which it is built Gita or Kuran has not been made to keep it in front of you to wprship daily but it is built to study ,it is built to think about the statements written in it and follow it in your life style.every religion is supporter of non-violence then why people kill each other on the name of religion .this is the reason it is notworthy to state"When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity; when many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion."

Aligarh Muslim University exam Part one

This is the incident of that time when I was appearing for IIt exam.That was crucial situation as I was appearing for third time.As it was my last attempt so I filled application forms of almost of the exams.it was notworthy to say that I was in great Frustation stage.It is really very difficult to overcome on this stage.Frustration can be a result of blocking motivated behavior. An individual may react in several different ways. He/She may respond with rational problem-solving methods to overcome the barrier. Failing in this, he/she may become frustrated and behave irrationally. An example of blockage of motivational energy would be the case of a worker who wants time off to go fishing but is denied permission by his/her supervisor. Another example would be the executive who wants a promotion but finds he/she lacks certain qualifications.
let us come on the point as I was telling i filled the forms of all the exams,me with my Cousin Anshu (he came from the native) had got our examination center at Aligarh for Aligarh Muslim University entrance exams.we had to leave for the exam as one day before.As I was the eldert one I had the responsibility to travel to Aligarh along with Anshu for the exam.
we started our journey from NewDelhi railway station.there was a great rush those a days we thought to travel by the train Lichhwi counted as one of the worsts train with respect to reaching time and comfort.we had no another root so we started our journey.
it was great rush and we were in general boogie, it was very difficult to stay even to stand properly too.it was not the case that we were only two students going for the exams,there were so many with the same situation like this,Suddenly I saw a beautiful girl with her friend was standing in the same way I was.I was not as emotional as my friends but I felt something was happening in my mind after seeing her.Tell you the truth, she's not that good-looking. She doesn't stand out in any way. Her clothes are nothing special. The back of her hair is still bent out of shape from sleep. She isn't young, either - must be near twenty, not even close to a "girl," properly speaking. But still, I know from fifty yards away: She's the 100% perfect girl for me. The moment I see her, there's a rumbling in my chest, and my mouth is as dry as a desert.Maybe you have your own particular favorite type of girl - one with slim ankles, say, or big eyes, or graceful fingers, or you're drawn for no good reason to girls who take their time with every meal. I have my own preferences, of course. Sometimes in a restaurant I'll catch myself staring at the girl at the next table to mine because I like the shape of her nose.But no one can insist that his 100% perfect girl correspond to some preconceived type. Much as I like noses, I can't recall the shape of hers - or even if she had one. All I can remember for sure is that she was no great beauty. It's weird.

THE HOLOCAUST

There are some incidents happened in the world which have not only made a great impact on the future but also changed the meaning and definition of common life Style.
Such a very cruel incident happened during second world war commonly known as Holocaust.It begins in 1933 when Hitler came to power in Germany and ended in 1945 when the Nazis were defeated by the Allied powers. A major issue in contemporary Holocaust studies is the question of functionalism versus intentionalism. The terms were coined in a 1981 article by the British Marxist historian Timothy Mason to describe two schools of thought about the origins of the Holocaust. Intentionalists hold that the Holocaust was the result of a long-term masterplan on the part of Hitler's and that Hitler was the driving force behind the Holocaust. Functionalists hold that Hitler was anti-Semitic, but that he did not have a masterplan for genocide. Functionalists see the Holocaust as coming from below in the ranks of the German bureaucracy with little or no involvement on the part of Hitler. Functionalists stress that the Nazi anti-Semitic policy was constantly evolving in ever more radical directions and the end product was the Holocaust.
Intentionalists like Lucy Dawidowicz argue that the Holocaust was planned by Hitler from the very beginning of his political career, at very least from 1919 on, if not earlier. Later Dawidowicz was to date the decision for genocide back to November 11, 1918. Other Intentionalists like Andreas Hillgruber, Karl Dietrich Bracher and Klaus Hildebrand suggested that Hitler had decided upon the Holocaust sometime in the early 1920s. More recent intentionalist historians like Eberhard Jäckel continue to emphasize the relative earliness of the decision to kill the Jews, although they are not willing to claim that Hitler planned the Holocaust from the beginning. Yet another group of intentionalist historians such as the American Arno J. Mayer claimed Hitler only ordered the Holocaust in December 1941.Functionalists like Hans Mommsen, Martin Broszat, Götz Aly, Raul Hilberg and Christopher Browning hold that the Holocaust was started in 1941-1942 as a result of the failure of the Nazi deportation policy and the impending military losses in Russia. They claim that what some see as extermination fantasies outlined in Hitler's Mein Kampf and other Nazi literature were mere propaganda and did not constitute concrete plans. In Mein Kampf Hitler repeatly states his inexorable hatred of the Jewish people, but no-where does he proclaim his intention to exterminate the Jewish people.Furthermore, Functionalists point to the fact that in the 1930s, Nazi policy aimed at trying to make life so unpleasant for German Jews that they would leave Germany. Adolf Eichmann was in charge of faciliating Jewish emigration by whatever means possible from 1937 on, until October 3, 1941 were German Jews forbidden to leave, when Reinhard Heydrich issued a order to that effect.Functionalists point to the SS's support for a time in the late 1930s for Zionist groups as the preferred solution to the "Jewish Question" as another sign that there was no masterplan for genocide. The SS only ceased their support for German Zionist groups in May 1939 when Joachim von Ribbentrop informed Hitler of this, and Hitler ordered Himmler to cease and desist as the creation of Israel was not a goal Hitler thought worthy of German foreign policy.In particular, Functionalists have noted that in German documents from 1939 to 1941, the term "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" was clearly meant to be a "territorial solution", that is the entire Jewish population was to be expelled somewhere far from Germany and not allowed to come back.At first, the SS planned to create a gigantic "Jewish Reservation" in the Lublin, Poland area, but the so-called "Lublin Plan" was vetoed by Hans Frank, the Governor-General of Poland who refused to allow the SS to ship any more Jews to the Lublin area after November, 1939. The reason why Frank vetoed the "Lublin Plan" was not due to any humane motives, but rather because he was opposed to the SS "dumping" Jews into the Government-General. In 1940, the SS and the German Foreign Office had the so-called "Madagascar Plan" to deport the entire Jewish population of Europe to a "reservation" on Madagascar. The "Madagascar Plan" was cancelled because Germany could not defeat Britain and until the British blockade was broken, the "Madagascar Plan" could not be put into effect.Finally, Functionalist historians have made much of a memorandum written by Himmler in May, 1940 explicitly rejecting extermination of the entire Jewish people as "un-German" and going on to recommend to Hitler the "Madagascar Plan" as the preferred "territorial solution" to the "Jewish Question". Not until July 1941 did the term "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" come to mean extermination.
Recently, a synthesis of the two schools has emerged that has been championed by such diverse historians such as the Canadian historian Michael Marrus, the Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer and the British historian Ian Kershaw that contends that Hitler was the driving force behind the Holocaust, but that he did not have a long-term plan and that much of the initiative for the Holocaust came from below in an effort to meet Hitler's perceived wishes.
Another controversy was started by the sociologist Daniel Goldhagen, who argues that ordinary Germans were knowing and willing participants in the Holocaust, which he claims had its roots in a deep eliminationist German anti-Semitism. Most other historians have disagreed with Goldhagen's thesis, arguing that while anti-Semitism undeniably existed in Germany, Goldhagen's idea of a uniquely German "eliminationist" anti-Semitism is untenable, and that the extermination was unknown to many and had to be enforced by the dictatorial Nazi apparatus.You can feel the hotness and concept behind the happening og these incidents in the words of initiator Heinrich Himmler itself

“

I also want to refer here very frankly to a very difficult matter. We can now very openly talk about this among ourselves, and yet we will never discuss this publicly. Just as we did not hesitate on june 1934, to perform our duty as ordered and put comrades who had failed up against the wall and execute them, we also never spoke about it, nor will we ever speak about it. Let us thank God that we had within us enough self-evident fortitude never to discuss it among us, and we never talked about it. Every one of us was horrified, and yet every one clearly understood that we would do it next time, when the order is given and when it becomes necessary. I am now referring to the evacuation of the Jews, to the extermination of the Jewish People. This is something that is easily said: 'The Jewish People will be exterminated', says every Party member, 'this is very obvious, it is in our program — elimination of the Jews, extermination, a small matter.' And then they turn up, the upstanding 80 million Germans, and each one has his decent Jew. They say the others are all swine, but this particular one is a splendid Jew. But none has observed it, endured it. Most of you here know what it means when 100 corpses lie next to each other, when there are 500 or when there are 1,000. To have endured this and at the same time to have remained a decent person — with exceptions due to human weaknesses — has made us tough, and is a glorious chapter that has not and will not be spoken of. Because we know how difficult it would be for us if we still had Jews as secret saboteurs, agitators and rabble rousers in every city, what with the bombings, with the burden and with the hardships of the war. If the Jews were still part of the German nation, we would most likely arrive now at the state we were at in 1916 and '17 . . . . The Nazis established killing centers for efficient mass murder. Unlike concentration camps, which served primarily as detention and labor centers, killing centers (also referred to as "extermination camps" or "death camps") were almost exclusively "death factories." German SS and police murdered nearly 2,700,000 Jews in the killing centers either by asphyxiation with poison gas or by shooting. The first killing center was Chelmno, which opened in the Warthegau (part of Poland annexed to Germany) in December 1941. Mostly Jews, but also Roma (Gypsies), were gassed in mobile gas vans there. In 1942, in the Generalgouvernement (a territory in the interior of occupied Poland), the Nazis opened the Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka killing centers (known collectively as the Operation Reinhard camps) to systematically murder the Jews of Poland. In the Operation Reinhard killing centers, the SS and their auxiliaries killed approximately 1,526,500 Jews between March 1942 and November 1943. Almost all of the deportees who arrived at the camps were sent immediately to death in the gas chambers (with the exception of very small numbers chosen for special work teams known as Sonderkommandos). The largest killing center was Auschwitz-Birkenau, which by spring 1943 had four gas chambers (using Zyklon B poison gas) in operation. At the height of the deportations, up to 6,000 Jews were gassed each day at Auschwitz-Birkenau in Poland. Over a million Jews and tens of thousands of Roma, Poles, and Soviet prisoners of war were killed there by November 1944. Though many scholars have traditionally counted the Majdanek camp as a sixth killing center, recent research had shed more light on the functions and operations at Lublin/Majdanek. Within the framework of Operation Reinhard, Majdanek primarily served to concentrate Jews whom the Germans spared temporarily for forced labor. It occasionally functioned as a killing site to murder victims who could not be killed at the Operation Reinhard killing centers: Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka II. It also contained a storage depot for property and valuables taken from the Jewish victims at the killing centers. The SS considered the killing centers top secret. To obliterate all traces of gassing operations, special prisoner units (the Sonderkommandos) were forced to remove corpses from the gas chambers and cremate them. The grounds of some killing centers were re-landscaped or camouflaged to disguise the murder of millions. For over six decades, the experiences that we find too difficult to even think about, have been haunting the survivors. For over six decades, the survivors have been trying to educate the world about the Holocaust. For over six decades, the survivors have been remembering and saying the Kaddish for the victims. Sadly, these men and women are now in their seventies and eighties and will not be able to continue the struggle for much longer. These survivors have fought for life when there was only death, fought for good when there was only evil, and fought for the future when there was only the past. Their struggles have not only become part of our history but have shaped and prepared our future. The survivors are leaving us, the younger generation, with a legacy of great worth. We are left with a struggle - not an easy one, for struggles never are - but certainly a worthy one. We have been given the duty to fight for our rights and our future as well as the duty to fight against ignorance and bigotry. We represent the future as well as the past. We are to remember and to never forget.

”

Gandhi's Assassination

It was really the unexpected incident when the Non_Violence Prophet Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated by Nathu Raam Godse in 1948.Norman Schwarzkopf once said, “It doesn’t take a hero to order men into battle. It takes a hero to be one of the men who goes into battle.” A hero makes a positive impact on people from donating food to saving people’s lives or being brave enough to fight for our country. Heroes have qualities such as being brave, devoted, positive, and compassionate. To be a person’s hero you don’t have to be famous, you just have to accomplish something that affects their lives. India’s greatest leader, Mahatma Gandhi, is definitely what people around the world call a hero.And shooting this type of hero will definitely will not be accepted any where.
Today it is a fashion,to criticize Mahatma Gandhi,without knowing anything about him.this is my personal opinion,if somebody is criticizing character like Mahatma gandhi he should be aware of all the facts regarding this.it would be better to know what Godse says after killing the prophet.Nathuram Ghodse is often a misunderstood character. He is referred to as a Hindu fanatic. It is often hard to understand Godse because the Government of India had suppressed information about him. His court statements, letters etc. were all banned from the public until recently. Judging from his writings one thing becomes very clear – He was no fanatic. His court statements are very well read out and indicate a calm and collected mental disposition. He never even once speaks ill about Gandhi as a person, but only attacks Gandhi’s policies which caused ruin and untold misery to Hindus. Another interesting point to note is that Godse had been working with the Hindu refugees fleeing from Pakistan. He had seen the horrible atrocities committed on them. Many women had their hands cut off, nose cut off, even little girls had been raped mercilessly. Despite this Godse did not harm even single Muslim in India which he could easily have. So it would be a grave mistake to call him a Hindu fanatic.This was the last statement to the Court given by NathuRaam Godse::Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined RSS wing of anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession.

I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other. I have read the speeches and writings of Ravana, Chanakiya, Dadabhai Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England , France , America and Russia . Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.

All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well-being of all India , one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan , my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.

Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them.. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day.

In fact, honour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita.. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.
In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India . It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to them.

The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way.

Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every thing; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible.

Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster. Gandhi’s pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India . It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India , Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani.. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect, it is spoken, but not written. It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma’s sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India . His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.

From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork. The Congress which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947.

Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’ and ‘peaceful transfer of power’. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called ‘freedom won by them with sacrifice’ – whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country – which we consider a deity of worship – my mind was filled with direful anger.

One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan , there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.

Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless. Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan . People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building.

After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House. I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi.

I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims. I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.

I think it would be clear why Godse killed Gandhi .Later in Next part I will write My opinion about this.

The dowry System

one of the biggest challenge in front of our society is dowry System.It is really very hectic to think that we are residing in 21st century,still the people are so conservative that they are thinking about cast system,Dowry System etc.I don't know what is the reason behind it but thinking about getting the money from the girl side is not to be said as a acceptable thinking.the incident of marriage happened with the agreeableness from both the side the Girl and the boy then why we are always claiming that the girl side should pay some extra money to the boy side as like something is going to be happened with the purchase or sell of human being.Due to this worst traditional System a big question is coming infront of our society in the form of Female feticide.Female feticide is one of the biggest challenges that India is facing today in terms of gender. It has become a significant social phenomenon. It transcends all barriers of caste, class and community and even the north-south dichotomy.It would be wrong to say that the government is doing nothing, but the problem is that sometimes even the government becomes helpless. If the people are not ready to change their mentality despite being educated, then ‘we’ are to be blamed. Any progress toward halting infanticide has been foiled by the rise in sex-selective abortions.I have talked with so many people in my contact,they usually ask ,i jhave paid this amount of money for my doughter /Sister then will i not take money from the girl side.I will simply ask to these people if every body will think something like this will it be possible to remove this disease from our society.At least one people should be initiative.always the question is asked why always I ,why not another person,I will answer this why are you always thinking about the another one why not about you.the best thing to purify the society is the purification of an individual.if every body will think to purify his own persona ,that day is not far we will find the well purified faultless society.The roots of purification are old, for those who have pursued the way of sanctity and holiness from all backgrounds and walks of life have known and understood the way that needed to be followed. For some, study was undertaken so that the inner steps could define the path to be pursued. For others, knowledge developed intuitively. Today, we are at a point at which knowledge can be combined with intuition in a sacred joining of spirit and matter - one that will allow the human self to become a sacred human, infused by the power of the soul.Now the big question arises whether this fault can be removed ,yes this can be removed definately.i will just want to mke remember the tradition about "sati pratha" at the time of Raja Raam Mohan Roy.at that time people felt the the adverse effect and theis tradition disappeared.Still now there is great need to think about the coming adverse effect of the syatem like dowry System.if every body is coonsidering this this system can easily be removed.....

My Teamlead

I am highly impressed with my team lead Karunakar Kothinti.when I started my career as a software developer,i was keen interested to do something different so that as a good technologist i should be counted as one of the best employee of the respective company.for this i know there was requirement of a good mentor who can guide me at every stage.
now working with a person like my team lead it was a great experience to do the work in passionate manner.the dedication and energy I have seen in my mentor I can say definitely I have seen the best working person in my life. As a role model. An effective mentor is invariably accomplished in their organizational role. They are generally admired and respected in their position, and their achievements in that position. Men tees will often look for a set of habits, approaches, style and skills that the mentor exhibits and that the men tee wishes to emulate and practice. The best thing i seen was his habbit to do the work honestly and taking the whole responsibility on his shoulder.A person who is considered honest is one who displays integrity, is genuine and not deceptive or fraudulent. Honesty is characterized by truth and sincerity. Honesty denotes the quality of being upright in principle and action. Honesty implies truthfulness, fairness in dealing with others, and refusal to engage in fraud, deceit, or dissembling.the work wichich is given to you its success depends on the fact that how much are you dedicated for this.How dedicated are you at work? How much are you willing to give? Let's say you work in an office where someone needs to stay late on a regular basis। It was your turn the day before, and you stayed. Today is Somebody's turn, but she had to leave work early because her child was sent home sick from school. Your boss asks you to stay again today. You have no real plans yourself right after work. Do you agree to stay or argue you stayed last night? Do you name another co-worker who should stay? Do you try and broker a deal with your boss? Sometimes, employees expect more dedication from their employer than they are willing to give themselves.it is good I think,because doing the work honestly and taking the responsbility will you that type of mental satisfaction that you will find after sometime that you have done your work.you are not a choker.I can say definitely if I will be working under the person like my teamlead that day is not far when I will be counted as one of the best technically skilled person.

कागज क tukde

वो आना और जाना
वो बिना बात मुस्कुराना
सोना और हसना
वो बातें बनाना
कॉलेज में जाके
वो आँखें लड़ना
हॉस्टल के ग्रौंद पे
लम्बे छक्के लगाना
वो रितिक की स्टाइल
रूम में ठुमके लगाना
वो कोडिंग के जाल में
गहरा दिमाग खपाना
ख़त्म हुआ सबकुछ
भुला सब फ़साना
जिंदगी में बस बचा
ज्यादा से ज्यादा कागज के टुकड़े कमाना.

कड़कते कड़क नोटों की कड़कता से कड़कना कड़क लोगों की करकराहट नहीं होती
जो सही में कड़क हैं उन्हें कड़कने की जरूरत नहीं होती.............

दूसरा 2

वो क्कफी समय पहले की बात है की जब मैं प्राथमिक का विद्यार्थी था और लोग मेरी वाक्पटु क्षमता के कायल थे
बड़े बुजुर्ग लोग भी जो हिंदी क्षेत्र में महारत हासिल कर रखे थे वो बोलते थे ये लड़का कैसे इतनी सुधा और नपी तुली हिंदी बोलता है
आज ऐसी हालत हो गयी है की कभी कभी जब मैं एक दो शब्द इस्तेमाल कर देता हु तो लोग बोलते हैं क्या बात है क्या हिंदी बोली आपने
ये साड़ी चीजे कही दिखाती है की आप जन जीवन से खासकर हमारे उत्तरभारतीयों के रोज मर्रा की जिन्दगी से कैसे हिंदी विलुप्त होती जा रही है
ये वो भाष है जो कभी ४० करोर भारतियों को आज़ादी दिलाई थी और आज गनीमत ये है की धीरे धीरे इस भाषा के अंदर इंग्लिश दीमक की तरह अपना घर बनाकर इसे खाए जा रहा है।

sadak

घर से होके परेशां
निकला होके हैरान

मन में थी हैरानी
छाई थी पूरी वीरानी

सोचा कुछ अछ्छा पाऊ
कुछ करू ऐसा की न पछताऊ

ख्हिजते हुए आया सड़क पे
ऐसा लगा पहुँच गया सायद नरक पे

झुझलाते हुए मैंने अपना कान खुजलाया
गुस्साते हुए दिल को थोडा सा समझाया

क्यों बेवक्त ऐसे नाराज ऐसे क्यों गुस्सा है
दिल क्या तेरा पत्थर क्या नहीं ये शीशा है

हाथ पीछे मोड़े जो अपना मैं नजर उठाया
सामने अपने एक अजीब सा नजारा पाया

लगा हवाओ का रुख पलटने
लगा ये मौसम मिजाज बदलने

जाते मुसाफिर वही ठहर गए
ऐसा लगा लक्ष से कैसे मुकर गए

दूर नजर उठाई बड़ी भीड़ कड़ी थी
ऐसा लगा कोई कुछ खास भादी पड़ी थी

तेज कदमों से जब पहुंचा उसके पास
अपने आँखों पे नहीं हुआ मुझे विश्वास

सामने मेरे जो वो पड़ा था
ऐसा लगा जैसे उसका वहां होना बहुत बड़ा था

कैसा जीव था वो समझ नहीं आया
सोचने की कोशिश की पर असफलता ही पाया


एक व्यक्ति से पूछा क्या है ये
उसने बोला दीखता नहीं क्या बे?

नजर हटके जब चस्मा किया साफ़
बोला सायद ठीक हो सारा भूल चुक माफ़

चश्मे की ताकत अब समझ में आई
वो धुधली चीज चश्मे ने एकदम साफ़ दिखलाई

६ फूट लम्बा एक शरीर गिरा पड़ा था
चोटें बहुत थी और जखमा बहुत गहरा था

माथे से खून था,हांथों में चोट थी
शररे बेजान था यही बस खोट थी

पैरों क निचे कोई विदेशी जूता था
चमक इतनी थी की चमकता पूरा फीता था


लगता था की कोई बड़े घर का सपूत है
या फिर देवलोक से आया कोई दूत है

लोगों से पूछा ये उठ कर बैठता क्यों नहीं
इसको उठाओ ऐसा सोता ठीक नहीं

लोगों ने घूरा बोला पागल हो गया है क्या
मरे हुए को बोलता है जिन्दा है ये क्या

अचानक दिमाग मेरा झन्ना से झंनाया
परेशां सा होकर निगाहे फिर झुकाया

लगा छाती जोर जोर से धड़कने
आँखें जलने लगी लगा कलेजा फरकने

पूछा कैसे हुआ ये कौन मारा इसको
कैसे गिरा ये ,कौन गिराया इसको

लोगों ने कहा अपने वहां पे था ये
कब कैसे हुआ ये किसी की नहीं पता ये

तभी अचानक एकदम से पुलिश आ गयी उधर
हटने लगी पूरी भीड़.छ गयी देह्सत उधर

लोग हटने लगे इधर उधर
हो गयी भीड़ तितर बितर
लाश को डाला गाड़ी में
गाड़ी चली गयी पुलिश ठाणे जिधर

भारी कद्मे से मैं लगा आगे चलने
शारीर चल रहा था पर मन लगा सोचने

क्या ऐसी बात थी क्या हुआ उसके साथ
क्यों गिरा वो बालक क्यों हुआ ये उसके साथ

सामने खड़ा बुजुर्ग मेरे मन को ताड़ गया
एक करारा जवाब देकर मुझे पूरा लताड़ गया

क्यों होते हो चिंतित यहाँ की यही कहानी है
जो इधर खोयी सावधानी मौत ही उसको आनी है

देश की राजधानी की सरको का ऐसा बुरा हाल है
अगर सही सलामत वापस लौटे तो समझना कोई नहीं मलाल है

जिन्दगी बहुत महत्वापूर्ण है करो इसका आदर
वरना बहुत पछ्तावोगे समझे भाई बिरादर.......................

People ask me ,how you have done this,as you were not aware about this.Usally this happens so many times,just by guessing about some particular thing I got the right solution.In my Mba preparation i have found there were so many difficult situations where just by considering the right scenario I got the proper solution.
In the view of most of scholars it may be said that it is pure hit and trail method.But a pure heat and trail method cannot always find the real solution.this can be properly explained as the flowing execution of SIXTH SENSE.
The Sixthsense is the part of every creature of this world.,particularly for human being.It is normal part for human psyche and abnormal or reserved for special and gifted persons.Everybody is aware of his five basic sense,but he is not aware properly for his sixth sense,the sense of overworldliness a connection to something more than their physical senses are able to perceive.
there is great need to develop this.it is not like thet we have to work to much hard for this.I have found in every task there is something which explains the pattern of similarity,we have need only to feel the pattern as well as to apply that.But as now a days a person is going to be too much talkative and very less think it is very difficult to think about a particular thing.Usually this thinking is not just like the normal thinking about some worse scenario.there is need to developsomething called critical thinking.
The critical thinker has the selfawareness to known the difference between rational thought based on careful consideration and an emotional response based on personal bias.Emotion is the enemy of reason.while being emotional nobody can find the proper reason.By understanding your own perspective you can also consider the perspective of others and come to a conclusion based on face not on feeling.
while developing the habbit of critical thinking you can find the ability of feel through Sixth sense is developed automatically.

वर्ल्ड कप मार

इस बार बार
कहने दो यार
इस बार नहीं
जाये बेकार
इस बार वार
नहीं है बेकार
पूरी है धार
तगड़ी है वार
पूरा है प्यार
तगड़ा दुलार
और पूरी है मार
नहीं होगी हार
जीतेंगे यार
चाहे रोये संसार
पर कप आएगा घर

शक

किसी ने कहा मुझसे
सिंघजी आपका कोड काम कर जायेगा
मैंने कहा शक है

भाई साहब ने कहा
इंडिया जीतेगी इसबार
मैंने कहा शक है

दोस्त ने कहा
तेरी सैलरी बढ़ जायेगी
मैंने कहा शक है

बॉस ने कहा
भाई तू जिम्मेदारी बाधा ले
मैंने कहा शक है

गर्लफ्रेंड ने कहा
हमारी शादी होगी
मैंने कहा शक है

बाबूजी ने कहा
तू बड़ा आदमी बनेगा
मैंने कहा शक है

सब बोले
तू बड़ा शक्की है
मैंने कहा शक है।

दूसरा

नजरें क्या जो मिलाए हमने तो हंगामा हो गया
लोग भड़कने लगे बाजु फड़कने लगे
अब आप ही बताओ किसने कहा था उनसे
क़त्ल करने को साराबी आँखों से।

Different

People usually says,the Software job is not suitable for them.I am not agree with this.After taking the experience of the software industry I can certainly tell,if you are containing quality to think and analyze the particular scenario, it is not a very huge and difficult task.

There are so many websites available on internet where you can take guidance to solve your problem,but the main thing happens with your analytical mind that cannot be developed by just reading some books or doing some tasks.
It is the thinking which works when you develop a habit to see the things differently and seriously.I have usaually seen people who talks very much they have no crystal clear idea about any topic ,So if you want to think deep,you should have a habit to speak few and to listen more.

Pandey Da

there are very few relationships existing in this world which does not take much more time to become hardcore.In my entire life I have met very few persons from whom i have got a lot of things to achieve.there are very few people who are not my family member but somehow a respect comes from inside of my body and soul for them.i am really very happy to say that i have met a person in bangalore during my most crucial struggling period who not only helped me to achieve my goal but he guided me every movement as like an elder brother,as like a gentle senior and above of all as like very good human being.
somehow,when i see my back life particularly that period when i was very much exhausted in search of a job,I can feel the importance of Pandey da.How a person could be so much helpful and sensitive to value and ethics it can not be explained.a good relationship is one that is treasured and held to a higher standard as it has taken many untraveled roads to reach its destination.
Right now i can say definitely he is second elder brother for me,and hope in future if i will get any chance in my life to serve you,it would be the great pleasure for me.
Thanks pandey da...

MY VIEW

I was so much shocked after the seeing the movie on Adolf Hitler.We as a common people we never think something about specialty of the virtue of some great incident happened in the world's history.Now it is the fashion to wear good cloths,to eat high rated dishes in restaurants and criticize our ancient history makers without knowing anything about them.
I as a software developer can feel the general knowledge gained by the people of corporate sectors.
if you are discussing something serious topic on world wars and theories you will find that nobody is interested to talk about them. But just start the topic on ruthless knifing movies discussion you will find a lot of opinions about that you can just feel how the people live and think here.